Well what would schools be without the normal sports teams and jocks running around? In my opinion it would just be abnormal, competitive sports are a tradition in school that all children should have the choice to experience. I believe OUSD should continue funding for sports programs. Not only because they are a tradition; but because the also improves health, teaches teamwork, and improves academic performances.
A more recent version of this report is available here. The reduced levels reflect not only the lingering effects of the recession but also continued austerity in many states; indeed, despite some improvements in overall state revenues, schools in around a third of states are entering the new school year with less Why school districts should continue funding funding than they had last year.
At a time when states and the nation are trying to produce workers with the skills to master new technologies and adapt to the complexities of a global economy, this decline in state educational investment is cause for concern. Our review of state budget documents finds that: At least 35 states are providing less funding per student for the school year than they did before the recession hit.
Fourteen of these states have cut per-student funding by more than 10 percent. These figures, like all the comparisons in this paper, are in inflation-adjusted dollars and focus on the primary form of state aid to local schools. At least 15 states are providing less funding per student to local school districts in the new school year than they provided a year ago.
This is despite the fact that most states are experiencing modest increases in tax revenues. Where funding has increased, it has generally not increased enough to make up for cuts in past years. Restoring school funding should be an urgent priority. The steep state-level K spending cuts of the last several years have serious consequences for the nation.
State-level K cuts have large consequences for local school districts. Some 44 percent of total education spending in the United States comes from state funds the share varies by state.
Local school districts typically have little ability to replace lost state aid on their own. Federal employment data show that school districts began reducing the overall number of teachers and other employees in Julywhen the first round of budget cuts began taking effect.
As of Augustlocal school districts had cut a total ofjobs since Many states and school districts have undertaken important school reform initiatives to prepare children better for the future, but deep funding cuts hamper their ability to implement many of these reforms.
On average, some 44 percent of total education expenditures in the United States come from state funds; the share varies by state. States typically distribute most of this funding through formulas that allocate money to school districts.
Each state uses its own formula. Many states, for instance target at least some funds to districts that have higher levels of student need e. In addition to the funding they distribute through general aid formulas, states may or may not use separate allocations to fund items such as pupil transportation, contributions to school employee pension plans, and teacher training.
Those allocations typically are smaller than general aid funding. State K Funding in the Current School Year Compared With States made widespread and very deep cuts to education formula funding since the start of the recession, and those cuts linger in most states.
See Figures 1 and 2. This survey finds that, after adjusting for inflation: More than two-thirds of states — 34 of the 48 states analyzed — are providing less per-student funding for K education in the current fiscal year than they did in fiscal year In more than one-fourth of states, or 14 of the 48, per-student funding is 10 percent or more below pre-recession levels.
The two states with the deepest cuts — Alabama and Oklahoma — each have reduced per-student funding by more than 20 percent from pre-recession levels. School Funding in Compared With Some states continued to cut their per-pupil school funding in the last year.
These cuts generally have been modest, but they generally come on top of severe cuts in previous years, leaving state funding for schools far behind pre-recession levels.This substantial reliance on state aid means that cuts to state formula funding force local school districts either to scale back the educational services they provide, to raise more revenue to cover the gap, or both.
The recession of and the slow recovery continue to affect state budgets and schools. Restoring school funding should be an urgent priority.
Steep state-level K spending cuts have serious consequences. Weakening a key funding source for school districts. Some 46 percent of K spending nationally comes from state funds (the share varies by state). Cuts at the state level force local school districts to scale back educational services, raise more local revenue to cover the gap, or both.
Why School Districts Should Continue Funding for Sports. Topics: High school I believe OUSD should continue funding for sports programs. Not only because they are a tradition; but because the also improves health, teaches teamwork, and improves academic performances.
Inequality in the funding of local schools by their own school districts is a serious issue nationwide. Some scholars argue that federal education funding requirements under Title I exacerbate.
School funding. Addressing the complex issue of statewide funding for schools, the report also recommends a targeted approach—distributing state aid for public education to the neediest school districts, schools, and students.
Nov 21, · Beginning 40 years ago, a series of court rulings forced states to reallocate money for education, giving more to schools in poor neighborhoods with less in the way of local resources.