There are various ways to do this; a common method is with an aboveground system in the form of a detention pond, but these take up usable land space. This is not a major issue in rural areas, but in urban environments, land space is expensive, and a loss of land space results in lost revenue. As a result, engineers and developers often turn to underground solutions, which take many forms.
May 30, It is becoming a staple in complex cases where the parties anticipate exchanging highly confidential information. Indeed, an adverse outcome is more likely without the proper counsel in place to manage the litigation.
In a nutshell, bad things can happen when a company fails to identify the proper in-house lawyers to manage litigation. As such, below are a few practice tips to help legal departments avoid labeling key in-house litigators as competitive decision-makers.
A simple questionnaire can help determine on an individual basis whether an in-house lawyer may be a competitive decision-maker. United States, F. This attorney-specific analysis is more easily articulated than applied, and an entire body of law has developed in view of this complexity.
Still, the major principles controlling this analysis can be distilled into four simple considerations based on the seminal direction of U. Steel and its progeny. Otherwise, an in-house lawyer is not likely an unacceptable risk of inadvertent disclosure because of status as in-house counsel, according to U.
Steel was Carpenter Technology Corp. In Carpenter, the district court considered whether two corporate counsel were an unacceptable risk of inadvertent disclosure and ultimately arrived at different conclusions for each attorney.
The court further strengthened its rule as articulated in U.
Steel that status as in-house counsel cannot alone create that probability of serious risk to confidentiality and further held that the general counsel was not an unacceptable risk of inadvertent disclosure where he was not involved in product pricing or technical design decisions; he was not involved in selection of vendors of the competitive business terms contained in purchase orders; nor was he involved in decisions involving competing products or marketing strategies.
Steel that a denial of access sought by in-house counsel on the sole ground of status as a corporate officer is error.
If a dispute arises concerning whether an in-house attorney is a competitive decision-maker, the party seeking access should offer a complete and thorough affidavit for each counsel seeking access to the confidential information, detailing their legal and nonlegal responsibilities if any.
Public policy and current jurisprudence suggest that an in-house lawyer should rarely be denied access because corporations are entitled to their chosen representation.
Practical Tips For Corporate Counsel 1. July 6, holding that Roberta Lang was not an unacceptable risk of inadvertent disclosure where she provided an uncontroverted sworn declarationand Volvo Penata of the Americas v.
Ensure that the duties of the in-house lawyer recipient are primarily legal, administrative or organizational and do not involve business decisions such as pricing, sales or marketing. See Brown Bag, F. Counsel holds a dual role as an officer and legal counsel in the company.
Get the latest news and analysis in the stock market today, including national and world stock market news, business news, financial news and more. An in-house lawyer who exercises competitive decision-making authority on the company's behalf represents an unacceptable risk of inadvertent disclosure of confidential information. Motivation is the reason for people's actions, willingness and timberdesignmag.comtion is derived from the word motive which is defined as a need that requires satisfaction. These needs could also be wants or desires that are acquired through influence of culture, society, lifestyle, etc. or generally innate. Motivation is one's direction to behavior, or what causes a person to want to repeat a.
Counsel is involved in production development or design, pricing, sales, marketing or market research decisions. Counsel is the sole in-house lawyer. Counsel occupies in-house attorney status as well as outside counsel status for related entities simultaneously.
Counsel is involved, either directly or indirectly, in competitive decision-making 7. The opinions expressed are those of the author s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.Key Areas of Responsibility.
Track and report key performance indicators at the family, commodity, team, supplier, and individual levels. Lead Supply Chain process improvement projects, including areas of freight, purchasing, and specifically raw materials (steel, aluminum, etc.).
Designing, Modeling, & Labeling ADA Compliant Ramps With Civil Cells (Print PDH from the September/October issue of Informed Infrastructure) Designing ADA-compliant wheelchair ramps for installation in new or rehabilitated roadway intersections is .
As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.
Decision-Making Processes at Steel Inc. BOB Organizational Behavior Lecturer: Dr. Indra 1. Which biases in decision making can be identified in the performances of both John and Jack? John - Anchoring bias Jack - Escalating commitment Questions and Answers Questions and Answers.
Maximpact Blog. Three Ways Fear Gets in the Way of Nonprofits’ Decision-Making Processes. By Steve Scheier.
Whether you’re an executive director, board member, funder, staff member or even a volunteer in a nonprofit, chances are you feel frustrated with the inefficiency of your organization’s decision-making processes. An in-house lawyer who exercises competitive decision-making authority on the company's behalf represents an unacceptable risk of inadvertent disclosure of confidential information.